Avoid These Common ECO4 Mistakes
Learn why ECO4 applications fail and how UGRANT helps you avoid rejection. Get expert guidance from the start to maximize your approval chances.
ECO4 applications fail for various reasons, but most rejections are preventable with proper preparation and professional guidance. Understanding common pitfalls helps you avoid wasted time and ensures your application succeeds first time.
This guide reveals the most frequent reasons ECO4 applications are rejected, explains how to avoid them, and shows why working with UGRANT and approved installers dramatically increases your chances of approval.
1. Incomplete or Incorrect Documentation
The most common reason for ECO4 rejection is missing or incorrect documentation. Energy companies have strict requirements, and incomplete applications are automatically declined.
Common Documentation Mistakes:
- Benefit letters more than 3 months old
- Missing pages from bank statements or award letters
- Proof of address not matching application address
- ID documents that are expired or unclear
- Missing landlord permission letters for tenants
- Income evidence that doesn't cover all household members
How UGRANT Prevents This:
- Approved installers provide detailed checklist of required documents
- Documents are reviewed before submission to catch errors
- Guidance on obtaining missing documentation
- Clear communication about what's acceptable vs. not acceptable
Professional installers know exactly what energy companies require because they submit applications daily. They'll spot problems before submission, saving you the frustration of rejection.
2. EPC Rating Issues
Your property's Energy Performance Certificate is critical to ECO4 eligibility, and EPC-related problems are a frequent cause of rejection.
Common EPC Problems:
- Too efficient: Properties rated A, B, or C typically don't qualify
- Outdated EPC: Certificate more than 10 years old
- Incorrect property details: EPC doesn't match actual property configuration
- Post-improvement EPC: Using an EPC created after previous improvements without declaring them
- Suspended EPC: Certificate flagged as potentially inaccurate
How UGRANT Prevents This:
- Installers check EPC validity before proceeding
- Can arrange new EPC assessments if required
- Verify EPC details match actual property
- Advise whether improvements will achieve required savings
If you've had work done since your last EPC, or if your EPC is very old, your installer will identify this early and arrange a new assessment before submitting your application.
3. Property Not Suitable for Proposed Improvements
Not every improvement works for every property. Applications fail when proposed measures aren't technically suitable for the home.
Suitability Issues:
- Cavity wall problems: Cavities already filled, too narrow, or have existing issues
- Structural issues: Damp, structural damage, or poor building condition
- Roof unsuitability: Roof can't support solar panels or lacks loft space
- Heat pump incompatibility: Property can't accommodate heat pump requirements
- Listed building restrictions: Conservation rules prevent external changes
How UGRANT Prevents This:
- Thorough pre-application home survey identifies issues
- Alternative measures recommended if initial plan won't work
- Structural surveys arranged if concerns exist
- Only technically suitable improvements are proposed
The home survey stage is crucial. Experienced installers know what to look for and won't proceed with applications destined to fail due to technical incompatibility.
4. Income or Benefits Verification Failures
Proving your income or benefits status is essential, and many applications fail because the evidence doesn't meet requirements.
Verification Problems:
- Self-employed income without proper accountant certification
- Benefits evidence showing income above thresholds
- Household income calculated incorrectly (missing earners)
- Benefits stopped or changed during application process
- Universal Credit award letter showing no entitlement
- Tax credits cancelled but not declared
How UGRANT Prevents This:
- Clear guidance on what income counts and doesn't count
- Help calculating total household income correctly
- Advice on obtaining proper income evidence
- Benefits status verified before application submission
- Updated documentation requested if circumstances change
Income calculation can be complex, especially for households with multiple earners or varied income sources. Installers experienced with ECO4 understand these complexities and ensure documentation clearly demonstrates eligibility.
5. Landlord Permission Issues
Tenants need landlord permission for ECO4 work, and problems with this consent are surprisingly common.
Permission Problems:
- Generic permission letter without specific measures listed
- Unsigned or undated landlord consent
- Landlord not the legal property owner (subletting situation)
- Landlord permission withdrawn before work completed
- Social housing without proper housing association approval
How UGRANT Prevents This:
- Template permission letters provided to tenants
- Guidance on explaining benefits to landlords
- Verification of landlord ownership status
- Permission secured before significant work on application
- Direct installer contact with landlords if needed
Many landlords are enthusiastic about ECO4 because improvements increase property value and reduce maintenance. Installers can help you present the opportunity positively and secure proper written consent.
6. Previous ECO Funding Not Declared
If your property received previous ECO funding, this must be declared. Failure to do so results in automatic rejection and potential fraud investigation.
Declaration Issues:
- Not knowing property had previous ECO work (common with purchased homes)
- Assuming previous work means you can't apply again (often you can)
- Trying to claim funding for already-funded measures
- Incomplete declaration of what was previously installed
How UGRANT Prevents This:
- Installers check ECO funding database before applying
- Clear questions about previous improvements during survey
- Proper declaration of previous work on applications
- Identification of additional measures still available
Having previous ECO funding doesn't automatically disqualify you. Many homes receive multiple rounds of improvements. The key is proper disclosure—installers know how to check history and present additional funding opportunities correctly.
7. Insufficient Energy Savings Projected
ECO4 requires proposed improvements to deliver specific carbon and energy savings. Applications fail if projections don't meet minimum thresholds.
Savings Calculation Issues:
- Single measures not providing enough savings alone
- Property already relatively efficient, limiting improvement potential
- Incorrect calculations in technical submissions
- Failing to bundle multiple measures to meet thresholds
How UGRANT Prevents This:
- Professional energy calculations before application
- Multiple measures combined to achieve required savings
- Alternative improvement packages if initial plan insufficient
- Honest assessment if property genuinely won't qualify
This is highly technical and where professional expertise matters most. Installers use specialized software to model energy savings accurately and design improvement packages that meet ECO4 requirements.
8. Timeline Mistakes and Delays
Time-related errors cause applications to fail, even when everything else is correct.
Common Timeline Problems:
- Documents expiring during application process
- Benefits status changing before work completed
- Missing deadlines for additional information requests
- Applying too close to ECO4 scheme end dates
- Delayed responses causing funding allocation to expire
How UGRANT Prevents This:
- Applications submitted promptly with current documentation
- Proactive communication about time-sensitive requirements
- Contingency plans if circumstances change mid-application
- Realistic timelines set from the beginning
Professional installers manage the timeline carefully, ensuring documents stay current and responses are provided quickly. They understand urgency and won't let preventable delays jeopardize your application.
9. Why Professional Support Matters
The difference between DIY applications and professionally managed ones is stark. Here's why working through UGRANT significantly improves your success rate:
UGRANT Advantages:
- Experience: Installers submit dozens of applications monthly and know what works
- Pre-screening: Issues identified before submission, not after rejection
- Technical expertise: Proper energy calculations and measure selection
- Documentation support: Guidance on obtaining and presenting evidence correctly
- Direct relationships: Established connections with energy company compliance teams
- Problem-solving: Quick resolution if additional information is requested
- Higher approval rates: Professional applications succeed far more often
Most importantly, all this expertise is provided free through the ECO4 scheme. There's no cost to you for having professional support that dramatically increases your chances of approval.
Related ECO4 Articles
Get It Right First Time with UGRANT
Avoid rejection and wasted time. Use our eligibility checker to connect with approved installers who'll ensure your application is submitted correctly with all the right documentation.
Check My Eligibility